Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
violetemerald: A drawing of a purple butterfly on a light green background (Default)
[personal profile] violetemerald posting in [community profile] vidding
If you're here in the vidding community, I figure maybe you'd be interested in this survey of mine! I just created it, it'll stay open through March 8th (so for about 2 months), and it'll take about 15 minutes of your time to completely answer all of my questions. I hope as many people as possible end up taking the survey - I want an accurate representation of vidders & vid viewers from every corner of our section of fandom. So after you take the survey, please try to spread the word to other fanvideo viewers or creators! Thanks so much.

More details here: http://luvtheheaven.dreamwidth.org/785.html

Or just skip straight to the survey: https://survey.insightify.com/1f5-137-4b5-3d0

Date: 2015-01-06 08:06 am (UTC)
starlady: Raven on a MacBook (Default)
From: [personal profile] starlady
What are you going to use this information for? What is your plan for safeguarding sensitive and/or identifying information that you gather? Do you have any particular qualifications to be doing this research? If you are affiliated with a U.S. institution of higher education, have you received IRB approval for these survey questions? If not, why?
Edited Date: 2015-01-06 08:08 am (UTC)

Date: 2015-01-06 08:56 am (UTC)
starlady: Raven on a MacBook (Default)
From: [personal profile] starlady
I am not nervous. As a professional researcher, I am appalled at the glibness with which you are treating potential respondents' sensitive and/or identifying information, and by the casual biases displayed throughout your survey questions. Even if you had any idea about protecting sensitive information, a glance through your survey shows that you will not get any useful or statistically trustworthy data from it because of the way the questions are structured. See [personal profile] metatxt's comments below for more specific examples of problems with data security.

Date: 2015-01-06 11:05 am (UTC)
starlady: Raven on a MacBook (Default)
From: [personal profile] starlady
I certainly don't believe that academics have a monopoly on good research, but this is the opposite of good research. Even if it's a "casual" survey, I don't understand what the goal of a survey is that has such shoddy questions. For instance, the only two possible answers under sexual orientation are "mostly heterosexual" and "mostly homosexual"--leaving aside the question of what on earth those two designations mean, the question assumes either a) that there are no such thing as bisexual or ace people, for example, or that for whatever reason bisexual and asexual people don't make and watch vids. Now, if the latter is your assumption and you're looking to prove or disprove it, that's another (highly questionable) thing, but as it stands, the data you get is not going to show you anything useful about what your respondents actually think. It's only going to confirm your own stereotypes (which, as even a casual glance at tumblr would show, are by no means accurate to the world as vidding fans perceive it and themselves), and the other questions are riddled with similar problems.

I can't believe that any competent linguistics program would not have included discussion of these sorts of methodological problems, even at the undergraduate level. And SurveyFail certainly shows the harm that even a "casual" survey can do.
Edited Date: 2015-01-06 11:06 am (UTC)

Date: 2015-01-06 11:32 am (UTC)
starlady: Raven on a MacBook (Default)
From: [personal profile] starlady
Mm, you're right, some of the questions weren't displaying correctly on mobile. That was definitely my mistake. Still, with these questions, you're going to get results that won't tell you anything useful--the question about considering homosexuality as a sin, for example, ignores the fact that not all religions have the concept of sin, so you're not going to be able to relate the answers to that question to the answers about respondents' religious beliefs usefully. If your goal is to inform the vidding community about itself, this is not an effective way to do it, because the methodology is so flawed. And while I don't know anything about you other than what you've said here and on your DW profile, I can definitely judge the methodological problems with the survey based on what's in it.

Date: 2015-01-06 08:51 am (UTC)
metatxt: dapper lady journalist in fedora+suspenders recoiling from silhouette of tentacles (art: big media cthulhu)
From: [personal profile] metatxt
So... I appreciate your desire to apparently study vidding communities to satisfy your own curiousity or as some form of service to the greater vidding community??? I'm guessing? To be honest, the purpose and goal of this survey is unclear. I was more troubled when I actually clicked the link and saw the structure of the survey.

To highlight the most egregious example, why do you need people to provide their actual birthdate? as opposed to listing their age in years or selecting one of a few predetermined agegroups? Birthdates are highly sensitive information that could be used for identity theft or to link wallet-name identities to fandom identities. What guarantees are in place as to how such information would be used? or even kept secure? When you say you're going to share the results of this survey, does this mean you would be publishing all of these birthdates as well?

As [personal profile] starlady mentions above, people go through extensive training and oversight to ensure that research does not harm its subjects. As a member of vidding communities, I am sure you do not want to intentionally harm your friends and acquaintances here, but nothing in your survey gives any indication that you have the knowledge needed to safeguard against abuse of this information.

Profile

vidding: filmstrip + vidding with hearts over i (Default)
Vidding

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 11 12
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 02:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios